Monday 28 July 2014

Sister Rosemary Nyirumbe #SisterRosemaryNyirumbe


She gives hope for young women scarred by war



In Gulu, Uganda, Sister Rosemary has made it her mission to provide within an orphanage a home, a shelter for women and girls whose lives have been shattered by violence, rape and sexual exploitation.
At the Saint Monica Girls’ Tailoring Center she runs, those women can become themselves again, thanks to the security and comfort they feel a tremendous accomplishment in a country still fragile from years of civil war. But what truly fascinates the people who have the privilege to meet with Sister Rosemary  as I did when I narrated a film about her, Sewing Hope is her magnetic and contagious energy.
For girls who were forcibly enlisted as child soldiers, Sister Rosemary has the power to rekindle a bright light in eyes long gone blank. For women with unwanted children born out of conflict, she allows them to become loving mothers at last.
The traumas she heals are unfathomable, but the reach of her love is boundless.

Arvind Kejriwal (@ArvindKejriwal)


A powerful outsider in Indian politics


Arvind Kejriwal is the antithesis of the modern-day Indian politician. He’s no Hindu nationalist, he doesn’t have a famous surname, and no, there is no evidence that he has made money from politics.
A former civil servant, he cut his teeth in public life as an activist campaigning for greater transparency in government. But it was his role as the driving force behind a grassroots anticorruption movement in 2011 that catapulted him onto the national stage. Late last year, he became chief minister of Delhi following a remarkable political debut by his Aam Aadmi, or common man, party.
Though his administration lasted a mere 49 days, with Kejriwal proving less adept at turning the wheels of government than campaigning against it, his image as the quintessential outsider taking on powerful interests a David versus many mighty Goliaths has earned him a unique place in Indian politics.

India Polio Free #IndiaPolioFree: @UNICEF

ભારત પોલીયો મુક્ત : યુનિસેફ


આ સમાચાર વાંચીને ખુશી થઇ કે ભારતમાં છેલ્લા બે વર્ષ દરમિયાન પોલીયોનો એક પણ કેસ નોંધાયો નથી. પોલીયોની સતત દેખરેખ અને મોનીટરીંગ સંબંધીત રીપોર્ટ દ્વારા જણાવવામાં આવ્યું છે કે ભારતમાં આ વર્ષે પણ પોલીયોનો એક પણ કેસ નોંધાશે નહીં અને ભારતને વર્ષ ૨૦૧૪માં પોલીયો મુક્‍ત પ્રમાણપત્ર મળ્યું .


દુનિયાભરનાં દેશોમાં વર્લ્‍ડ હેલ્‍થ ઓર્ગેનાઇઝેશન, રોટરી ઇન્‍ટરનેશનલ તેમજ સ્‍થાનીક સરકારો દ્વારા પોલીયો હટાવો ઝુંબેશ સતત થવાનાં કારણે હવે માત્ર પાકિસ્‍તાન ઉપરાંત આફ્રિકી દેશો, અફધાનીસ્‍તાનના દેશોમાં જ પોલીયોનું નામ બચ્‍યુ છે.દુનિયાનાં તમામ દેશોમાંથી હવે પોલીયો નાબુદ થઇ રહ્યો છે એ ખુબ જ સારી વાત છે .

ભારતમાં પોલીયો નાબુદ થયો છે. પોલિયોનું અંગ્રેજીમાં આખું નામ Poliomyelitis છે . આ એક એવી જાતનો વાયરસ છે જે ખાસ કરીને ૫ વર્ષથી નીચેના બાળકોને એનો શિકાર બનાવતો હોય છે . આ કારણથી એને બાળ લકવો ( Infantile Paralysis ) પણ કહેવામાં આવે છે .જે બાળકો એમાંથી બચી જાય છે એને પોલિયો જીવનભર માટે વિકલાંગ બનાવી દે તેવી બિમારીઓમાંની એ એક છે.

મારા માટે આ સમાચારથી ખુશ થવાનું ખાસ કારણ એ છે કે યુનિસેફે અભિતાભ બચ્ચનનું સન્માન કર્યું .

Saturday 26 July 2014

@narendramodiએ દેશને સુરાજ્ય તરફ લઈ જવા #MyGov (http://mygov.nic.in/) વેબસાઈટ લોન્ચ કરી


વડાપ્રધાન નરેન્દ્ર મોદીએ લોકસભા ચૂંટણી દરમ્યાન દેશની જનતાને આપેલા વચનો પુરા કરવા વધુ એક પગલું ભર્યું છે. મોદીએ દેશને સુરાજ્ય તરફ આગળ લઈ જવા માટે http://mygov.nic.inવેબસાઈટ લોન્ચ કરી છે જેમાં અલગ અલગ વિષયો પર ચર્ચા કરી શકાશે તેમજ દેશના નાગરિકો પોતાના વિચારો પર રજૂ કરવાનો મ્હોકો પણ મળશે.
 
નરેન્દ્ર મોદીએ ચૂંટણી પ્રચાર દરમ્યાન દેશવાસીઓને કહ્યું હતું કે જો આ વખતે ભાજપની સરકાર ચૂંટાશે તો અમારી સરકાર દેશને સુરાજ્યની દિશામાં આગળ વધારશે. આ વચનનું પાલન કરવા વડાપ્રધાન નરેન્દ્ર મોદીએ http://mygov.nic.in વેબસાઈટ લોન્ચ કરી છે. આ વેબસાઈટ લોન્ચ કરવાનો મુખ્ય હેતુ ભારતને સુરાજ્યની દિશામાં લઈ જવાનો છે. જેમાં દેશના નાગરિકોના વિચારો, આશાઓ અને અપેક્ષાઓને સાંકળીને નવી સિદ્ધિઓ પ્રાપ્ત કરવાની છે.
 
http://mygov.nic.in વેબસાઈટ અંગ્રેજી ઉપરાંત હિન્દી ભાષાની પણ સુવિધા આપવામાં આવી છે જેના કારણે સામાન્ય નાગરિક પણ સમજી શકે અને પોતાના વિચારો રજૂ કરી શકે. ખાસ કરીને રોડ-રસ્તાઓ અને ગંગા સુધારા, બાળકીઓના શિક્ષણ માટેના સૂચનો અને સરકારી વિભાગો સાથે સર્જનાત્મક જેવા વિષયો પર સૂચનો અને ચર્ચા કરાતા ટેબ મુકવામાં આવ્યા છે.
 
વેબસાઈટ પર ‘મારો દેશ, મારી સરકાર, મારો ફાળો’નું સુત્ર કેન્દ્ર સ્થાને રાખવામાં આવ્યું છે. જે મુજબ ‘ચર્ચા’ ટેબમા જણાવવામાં આવ્યું છે કે અમે ભારત સાથે સંબંધિત વિવિધ વિષયો પર તમારી સલાહ, વિચારો અને સૂચનો માંગીએ છીએ. વિચાર વ્યક્ત કરવા, તર્ક-વિતર્ક માટે અને સૂચનો આપવા માટે તમે ચર્ચામાં સામેલ થાઓ અને ‘હુ કરીશ’ ટેબમાં જણાવાયું છે કે હજુ રાષ્ટ્રના નિર્માણમાં ઘણા કામ કરવાના છે. આ કાર્ય કરવા માટે જો તમારી રુચિ હોય તો ભારતના વિકાસમાં યોગદાન આપો. આ બન્ને ટેબ ખાસ કલર વડે વધુ હાઈલાઈટ કરવામાં આવી છે.

Friday 25 July 2014

#Mumbai #terror #attacks: #Pakistan fails to mention @HafizSaeedJUD's name in 26/11 #chargesheet



India on Friday lodged a strong protest with Pakistan over the lack of progress in the trial of Lashkar-e-Taiba commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi and six others charged with involvement in the 2008 Mumbai attacks.

It is, however, quite another fact that Islamabad had five years ago clearly signalled its intention to not go after Jamaat-ud-Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed, the man New Delhi says masterminded the terrorist outrage. A chargesheet filed by Pakistan's Federal Investigation Agency, accessed by Mail Today, names Lakhvi, the operational commander of Lashkar-e-Taiba, as the "mastermind of the Mumbai terrorist attack" while glossing over the alleged role of Saeed despite considerable evidence gathered by Indian and Western security agencies over his role in the incident.

The FIA chargesheet names the attackers, details their training and acquisition of supplies and firearms, and goes on to describe the attack in detail, even naming dozens of the victims. The Pakistan document is thus not significantly different from what India says happened-except that it gives Saeed a complete miss.

The chargesheet filed by the FIA in the anti-terrorism court on November 25, 2009 has nothing on Saeed even though Ajmal Kasab-the lone attacker who was captured alive-confessed that the LeT founder visited the 10 terrorists in Karachi and saw them off before they set sail for Mumbai in November 2008. The chargesheet states that the seven accused-Lakhvi, Hammad Amin Sadiq, Mazhar Iqbal alias Abu al-Qama, Abdul Wajid alias Zarrar Shah, Shahid Jamil Riaz, Jamil Ahmad and Younas Anjum-and 20 others set up training camps at Yousuf Goth in Karachi and at Mirpur Sakro in Thatta in Sindh province and obtained firearms, grenades and explosives for carrying out the attacks.


It acknowledges that Kasab, "a Pakistani national arrested in India", and the nine other attackers were trained in the camps in Sindh. "You accused Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, being operational commander of LeT, were mastermind of the Mumbai terror attack as you firstly received instructions and training and then imparted the same training, in the making and use of firearms, explosives, bombs and grenades to your coaccused, Kasab, and 9 other terrorists killed in India ," the chargesheet states.

The chargesheet, filed exactly a year after the attacks, said that the attackers targeted Taj Mahal Hotel, Oberoi Trident Hotel, Macchimar Colony, Cuffe Parade, Colaba, Chhatrapati Shivaji Terminus railway station and Leopold Cafe and created terror and "a sense of fear and insecurity in the people at large in India and Pakistan".

"By your aforesaid acts of terrorism, you disrupted the trade between (Pakistan and India) and also disrupted normal civil life of people of the two countries," it said. These offences are punishable under Pakistan's Anti-Terrorism Act of 1997 as well the country's Penal Code.

Jamil Ahmad and Younas Anjum were charged with providing Pakistani Rs.3.98 million through banks in Karachi and Muzaffarabad for carrying out the attacks, while Mazhar Iqbal and Abdul Wajid were accused of directing the attackers through VOIP connections, mobile phones and satellite phones. The seven men were also charged with providing rented houses and acquiring inflatable boats, a Yamaha engine, cellphones, GPS systems and the boats Al-Fouz and Al-Hussaini for the attackers.

The chargesheet further states that Kasab and the other terrorists were "trained and launched from Pakistan, for carrying out the deadly terrorist attacks in Mumbai" that killed 166 people. Significantly, the chargesheet names dozens of Indian victims, with the first name in the list being that of policeman Tukaram Omble, who played a pivotal role in Kasab's capture.

The charade continued to play out in the corridors of power on Friday. In New Delhi, Ministry of External Affairs summoned Pakistan's Deputy High Commissioner Mansoor Khan and lodged a strong protest against the adjournment of the trial in Pakistan for the seventh time in a row on Wednesday. At the same time, Indian Deputy High Commissioner Gopal Baglay met Director General (South Asia) Riffat Masood in Islamabad and registered a similar protest.
Indian officials in both New Delhi and Islamabad sought "regular briefings on the progress of the trial and the investigation by Pakistani authorities", sources said. The Indian officials emphasised the "high importance India attaches to bringing to justice all those responsible in Pakistan for the Mumbai terror attacks," the sources said.

In recent months, prosecutors have refused to appear in the antiterrorism court in Rawalpindi conducting the trial, reportedly due to threats from the Jamaat-ud-Dawa and other extremists. 

The last hearing on Wednesday was not held as the judge is on leave and the trial is expected to resume only in September, sources in Islamabad said. Pakistan said the government could do little in the ongoing trial. "Pakistan has an independent judiciary and the executive can only provide the prosecution the available evidence. We cannot interfere with the judiciary, which will decide the case on merit under the laws of the land," said Manzoor Ali Memon, spokesperson of the Pakistan High Commission.



#Kargil #VijayDiwas: #India remembers martyrs with #pride, pain


The country celebrates the 15th anniversary of its triumph in Kargil War. This is also an occasion that invokes feelings of both pain and pride for the families of the brave jawans who laid down their lives protecting the territory of India from intruders.

Defence Minister Arun Jaitley, Army chief Bikram Singh,Navy chief Robin Dhowan and Air Force chief Arup Raha paid tribute to martyrs at Amar Jawan Jyoti, India Gate in New Delhi.


The families of the soldiers who made the supreme sacrifice for the country make it a point to visit the war memorial in Drass each year on the occasion of Vijay Diwas.

They remember their loved ones with pride, but the feelings of sadness have not waned.

"This place and this day reminds us of those brave-hearts who sacrificed their lives for the country. My son was one of them. I am sad that I lost my son but, at the same time, there is a feeling of pride that he laid down his life for the country," said Col VN Thapar, father of Capt. Vijyant Thapar, who was martyred while leading an attack of the 2 Rajputana Rifles at Tololing.

Fifteen years and many peace overtures later, the situation on the LoC and the border has not changed much. The troops on the other side occasionally open fire at Indian posts, thereby violating the ceasefire agreed between India and Pakistan in 2003.

The army says it has not let its guard down and the jawans add that they are motivated and ready for any challenge.

"We are always ready for any challenge. We have the capability of giving a fitting reply to the enemy," said MK Salam, a jawan.

He said that Vijay Diwas makes the jawans remember the supreme sacrifices of their fellow soldiers and infuses them with a new vigour.

"Seeing the respect 



@narendramodi #Cabinet: Many #ministers still in the #Waitinglist


Uma Bharti, the new water resources minister, appeared a bit lost in the corridors of Parliament. She was expecting someone from her staff to meet her, but clearly there had been a mix-up. Finding her at a loose end, several Members of Parliament and their hangers-on began to shower her with pleasantries. As she tried to extricate herself from the melee, she found her path blocked by none other than poet and playwright Javed Akhtar, who with folded hands, said: "Aap to hamein bhool gayein (You've forgotten me)." Bharti smiled, much like a winner, then replied: "Aapko koi bhool sakta hai (How can anyone forget you)?" Unfazed, Akhtar tried to ask for a meeting, all the while holding on to his bag so that it wouldn't fall off his shoulder. But Bharti was already leaving, politely promising to meet very soon.

As the old order changeth and the BJP's 282 MPs in the Lok Sabha begin to taste the varied flavours that power brings, it is actually the club of nominated Congress MPs in the Rajya Sabha that makes the margins come alive. Akhtar who proudly wears his left-of-centre ideology on his sleeve, former newspaper editor H.K. Dua as well as Supreme Court lawyer KTS Tulsi are seen frequenting Finance Minister Arun Jaitley's chambers in Parliament. N.K. Singh, who recently switched from Nitish Kumar's Janata Dal (United) to BJP, sometimes stops by. Sometimes, lunch is arranged courtesy of Trinamool Congress member of the Rajya Sabha K.D. Singh, proprietor of the Republic of Chicken restaurant chain.

UPA's former minister of state for parliamentary affairs Rajeev Shukla, who shares a passion for cricket with Jaitley, often drops in. The politics of the day is probably on the menu. In the sound and fury of lobbying for a "committee" of one's choice or a good address in the Capital (preferably with a front lawn and servant quarters at the back), chairmen of House committees such as Kirit Somaiya and V.P. Singh Badnore and Parliamentary Affairs Minister M. Venkaiah Naidu are besieged by the adulation of the throng.

AIADMK MP M. Thambidurai is keenly aware that his party's informal support to the Modi Government could get him deputy speaker's post or the chairmanship of a powerful committee. Telugu superstar K. Chiranjeevi, who has allegedly spent large sums of money in "doing up" his Lutyens' bungalow in his former incarnation as tourism minister in the UPA government, is angling to keep the same house.

The four in Modi's core group

But before one mixes up the froth with the real thing, it would be imperative to recognise that after 10 long years, India's most powerful address once again has an occupant befitting its reputation. At 7 Race Course Road (RCR) in the heart of the Capital, Prime Minister Narendra Modi leads a group of five every few days to take stock of the most important developments taking place in and around the country. Besides Modi, the group consists of his most trusted colleague Arun Jaitley, BJP President and Modi's alter ego Amit Shah, Home Minister Rajnath Singh as well as chief RSS conduit and Transport Minister Nitin Gadkari.

Over dhoklas and tea, this caucus plots the dimensions of a new idea of India, reinventing the shibboleths that once sought to definitely define the new country in 1947. If Jawaharlal Nehru had the RSS banned in the wake of Mahatma Gandhi's assassination, well, 67 years later, it is time to roll back that taint. The Indian Council of Historical Research is supposed to help in reshaping the stories of this ancient land through new chief Y. Sudershan Rao, who is deeply interested in dating the Mahabharata and the Ramayana. Old ideologues such as Deendayal Upadhyaya-invoked by Modi during his acceptance speech to the BJP parliamentary board in the Central Hall of Parliament-may soon be resurrected, alongside icons the Nehru-Gandhis forgot, like Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel.

More prosaic discussion might revolve around the naming of new governors. Will Arun Jaitley speak to Ram Naik? Could Nitin Gadkari discuss the matter with Kalyan Singh? And yes, the medium of conversation is Hindi. After a full decade of the intimate and familiar, there's a new gig in town.

Sonia Gandhi's handloom saris, which included hand-me-downs from Indira Gandhi's wardrobe which, in turn, had been handpicked by the impeccably tasteful Pupul Jayakar, have given way. External Affairs Minister Sushma Swaraj, who is not even a member of Modi's inner circle, wears a no-nonsense jacket with her saris, Human Resource Development Minister Smriti Irani wears power loom and Commerce Minister Nirmala Sitharaman- well, she doesn't really care, as long as her acerbic and usually forthright remarks make it to tonight's TV news. In fact, the only person in the Prime Minister's circle who really cares about his clothes is Modi himself, with his starched kurtas and matching sandals. At the BRICS summit in Brazil recently, the Prime Minister stood out in a powder-blue bandhgala that Rajiv Gandhi would have been proud of.

The New Austerity

After a full decade of luscious mango parties during the monsoon, the BJP era seems markedly abstemious. Information and Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar threw a dinner recently, but packed it with journalists from Maharashtra.

Jaitley is probably the only minister with the charm and irreverence to throw a power-packed party which doesn't serve only Rooh Afza. But unlike the good old days of the UPA as well as Atal Bihari Vajpayee's NDA, the lobbies of Delhi's five-star hotels are bereft of newbies making power statements in starched white linen or designer khadi. In fact, rumour is that the lobbies are being watched, just in case the BJP's newly elected want to check out the fancier sights in town.


In any case, this lot seems far more rooted in Virudhunagar or Sikar, or Khargone and like to return to their constituencies on the weekend. Unlike Sonia's friends and courtiers who dabbled in art and heritage architecture, whether Rupika Chawla or Sunita Kohli, the BJP's self-styled connoisseurs of the good life are still missing from public view. Unlike Jitin Prasada or Praful Patel or Sachin Pilot, or Salman Khurshid, who seem comfortable in the several salons of Delhi, many new occupants of the 16th Lok Sabha have brought with them a whiff of the heat and dust of another country called the countryside. And as for Sonia's pre-eminent National Advisory Council, which had acquired the character of a parallel power circuit, Modi isn't about to outsource power to anyone outside his Cabinet.

Certainly, Atalji liked literature and music, sending writers such as Dinanath Mishra and Vidya Niwas Mishra to the Rajya Sabha, while singers like Jagjit Singh and Lata Mangeshkar were known to have performed for him. Modi, on the other hand, remains an enigma, although an English translation of his poems appeared in the run-up to the elections. Actor Salman Khan wished him luck ahead of the polls, but it was Aamir Khan who stole a march over everybody else in the Hindi film industry by calling on the Prime Minister. Still Modi seems to like Bharatanatyam, having taken time out to watch dancer Mythili Prakash in the Capital in the run-up to the General Election.

In the Vajpayee era, champagne and caviar were common treats on the prime minister's special flights across the world. During Manmohan Singh's travels abroad, champagne and caviar were still available, except the press couldn't share it with ministers travelling up front. In Modi's age, journalists have simply been prohibited from clambering aboard.

In fact, two months on, the Prime Minister's Office (PMO) doesn't even have a media adviser. The media will be told what it wants to know-in due time.

That phrase "need to know" could soon become the Modi Government new strapline, a buzzword for all seasons. At his regular caucus meetings, for example, Cabinet colleagues are invited to participate on a "need to know" basis, as was the case recently when Sushma Swaraj was asked to join in a conversation focused on the future of Delhi. With the six-month deadline of lieutenant governor's (LG) rule in the city-state soon to end in August, India's most powerful people weighed the pros and cons of either staking claim to form the next government or allowing fresh elections to be held. It was here that the decision to stake claim was formulated and a plan of action chalked out for the BJP's 32 legislators meeting with Lieutenant-Governor Najeeb Jung. It was here that the idea not to hold fresh elections in Delhi was discussed and dropped.

The inner circle

Clearly, Jaitley, Modi's eyes and ears in the Government, in Parliament, in the judiciary and everywhere else, is de facto Number Two in the administration, even though Rajnath is second to the Prime Minister in the formal pecking order.

In Modi's durbar, Jaitley is the only one who has been able to cast his net far and wide. Several of his long-time best friends in law have made it to the top jobs in the judiciary, starting with Mukul Rohatgi as the attorney-general and Ranjit Kumar as solicitor-general ending with four Additional Solicitor-Generals Pinky Anand, Maninder Singh, Neeraj Kishan Kaul and P.S. Narasimha.

In the Government as well, Jaitley's proteges have been awarded plum portfolios. The redoubtable but acerbic Sitharaman who got independent charge of the commerce portfolio, has travelled with Vice-President Hamid Ansari to China and joined the PM on his trip to the BRICS summit in Brazil.

Piyush Goyal, minister of state (independent charge) for power, coal, new & renewable energy, and a former BJP treasurer, as well as Dharmendra Pradhan, minister of state for petroleum and natural gas, are two Jaitley acolytes intent on carving their names in the annals of BJPdom. Soon after he took charge, Goyal took a leaf out of his mentor's book, reaching across the aisle and speaking to Biju Janata Dal MPs to resolve local political issues that ended up freeing as much as 1,500 MW power from the Mahanadi Coalfields of Odisha.

Checks and balances

But Modi has also balanced his proximity to Jaitley by making Rajnath the only other member of the powerful Appointments Committee of the Cabinet. Still, Rajnath has made way for Amit Shah, Modi's aide extraordinaire who, one suspects, would prefer to be known as someone who is fond of 'poha' with a generous squeeze of lemon, middle India's favourite fast food.

Soon after he became BJP president, Shah went to meet the RSS elders in Nagpur, including Sarsanghchalak Mohan Bhagwat, requesting them to continue RSS' support to the BJP, especially in the coming Assembly elections in Maharashtra, Jharkhand, Haryana and Jammu & Kashmir. Suresh Soni, the RSS joint general secretary, remains the influential liaison between the BJP and the Sangh, which has loaned two new leaders, Ram Madhav and Shiv Prakash, to BJP. Madhav has already sat through a meeting of leaders of the poll-bound states. While RSS bigwigs Bhaiyaji Joshi and Dattatreya Hosabale, who chipped in during the elections, refocus on their other Sangh duties, Joint General Secretary Krishna Gopal, who was also part of the trio, is likely to continue the coordination job with the party. As for Vinay Sahasrabuddhe who, though not an RSS officebearer, is the director-general of the Rambhau Mhalgi Prabodhini, an RSSinspired training institute for BJP cadres, he will be influential in policymaking through his assignment as adviser in Nitin Gadkari's staff.


But the RSS influence, since the elections, has been most visible in the manner in
which the Sangh's student organisation, the Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad (ABVP) passed a resolution against Delhi University's four-year undergraduate programme (FYUP) during its national executive meeting in Mangalore in May. ABVP leaders Sunil Ambekar and Rohit Chahal presented this resolution to the Prime Minister, soon after which the FYUP course was scrapped.
Some of the gossip has also centred on the supposed influence of the 38-year-old Smriti Irani, the erstwhile doyenne of "saas-bahu" television whose career has witnessed a meteoric rise. Is Smriti Irani a protege of Amit Shah or does she have the direct ear of the Prime Minister himself? It is said she can get to meet the PM sooner than most. Incidentally, like Rajnath, she too chose a private secretary who had served in the personal staff of a UPA minister, Beni Prasad Verma. While Rajnath has given up his private secretary, she continues to retain hers even though formal orders have not come.

At the Modi Government's swearing-in ceremony at the Rashtrapati Bhavan forecourt on May 26, Irani's name was announced much ahead of seven-time MP Maneka Gandhi (she reportedly doesn't like her portfolio at all), the woman and child development minister, or senior BJP leader Najma Heptulla, the token Muslim in the Cabinet who has predictably got the minority affairs ministry edging out Shahnawaz Hussain and Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi.

Sushma Swaraj's star in the Modi Cabinet is at an interesting juncture. She speaks to Modi personally, whether it is on Japan or Sri Lanka or China- although she was miffed that the PMO leaked the cancellation of Modi's visit to Japan to the media before she was told about it. In fact, Modi has ticked off Prakash Javadekar for not getting out the news as well and as quickly as the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) spokesperson S. Akbaruddin. When Javadekar tried to defend himself by saying that the I&B page also had several thousand followers, Modi responded: "I know how 'followers' are made. Having a few thousand 'followers' doesn't mean anything."

Question is, how does Swaraj compare in Modi's books with National Security Adviser Ajit Doval? A former and formidable Intelligence Bureau chief, the problem with Doval is that he is out of whack by about a decade, since he retired in 2005. He seems to have overcome the only serious blow to his reputation, which was his inability to capture hijackers of the IC 814 plane that ended up in Kandahar in 1999, with the successful operation to get 46 Indian nurses back home from Iraq.

But few people know that it is actually Swaraj who heads the Iraq crisis cell, not Doval. Doval may have travelled to Baghdad, but Swaraj pulled the strings from Delhi, speaking to influential figures in West Asia. Perhaps this is the classic MEA vs PMO power struggle, and perhaps this will only be resolved by that well-worn cliche, only time will tell.

The hand that hands down Modi's hand-picked bureaucrats, from Principal Secretary Nripendra Misra to Cabinet Secretary Ajit Seth, are expected to be the medium through which he wants to shape the country. Seth, appointed by Manmohan Singh, is on extension, but could be more powerful now. A move to transfer Financial Services Secretary Gurdial Singh Sandhu as urban development secretary was scotched by Seth, who ensured Shankar Aggarwal was posted instead. He was the one who dug up the order detailing the five-year limit for an officer to serve as a minister's private secretary. This was eventually invoked against several who had served in the personal staff of UPA ministers and therefore could not stay on with the current crop. This was how someone as powerful as Rajnath had to give up his private secretary. The word is that Seth was getting back at the home minister for overruling him and not granting an extension to former NATGRID head Raghu Raman.

Then there is Additional Principal Secretary P.K. Mishra, a Gujarat-cadre officer who hand-held Modi when he first became Gujarat chief minister. Another Gujarat-cadre officer, A.K. Sharma, has been given the responsibility of handling most of the infrastructure sector. He has been meeting industrialists such as Sumit Mazumder, vice-chairman and MD of Tractors India Limited and Ajit Gulabchand, CMD, Hindustan Construction Company, as well as Vinayak Chatterjee, CMD, Feedback Infra, to explain the Government's agenda and discuss the challenges in the infrastructure sector.

The influence that Sharma wields can be ascertained from the fact that he wants Ranjan Thakur, former personal secretary to Congress minister Ambika Soni, as the new director-general of Doordarshan, despite objections from Javadekar. The matter is now in the PMO and Sharma is apparently forcing a rethink by all sides. As for Modi's meeting with Facebook CEO Sheryl Sandberg, it was fixed by Hiren Joshi, who along with Pratik Doshi-both now in the PMO-handles the PM's presence on social media.

Government means business Certainly, the highlight of the Modi Government's social calendar has been the engagement ceremony of Amit Shah's son, Jay, in Gandhinagar on July 13. Modi himself couldn't make it as he was flying to the BRICS summit, but most of his council of ministers chartered a plane to attend. The who's who was in attendance, including journalists like Swapan Dasgupta, Rajya Sabha MP Parimal Nathwani, said to be close to industrialist Mukesh Ambani (Ambani himself wasn't present) and of course the old-new favourite in town, Gautam Adani, the head of the $9.3 billion Adani Group with interests ranging from coal trading, coal mining, oil and gas exploration to ports and power.

Adani is certainly the most powerful businessman in Modi's era. When Modi was formally named the BJP's prime ministerial candidate for the elections last September, shares for Adani Power soared 170 per cent. In the Modi era, Adani seems everywhere at the same time. He acquired Dhamra port in Odisha from L&T and Tata Steel the day the results came in, May 16. On July 16, his controversial Mundra SEZ was given environmental clearance.

Only the week before, the finance minister had declared several tax holidays in his Budget and said that "effective steps would be taken to operationalise SEZs and revive investors' interests to develop better infrastructure". Does the fact that Adani's star is high these days mean that Ambani's is relatively down? Fact is that Ambani hasn't met the Prime Minister yet, itself an event of gigantic proportion. Moreover, the Government has refused to hike the price of gas from $4.2 to $8.4 per million metric BTU as recommended by the previous C. Rangarajan Committee, a move which would have considerably benefited the Ambanis.

Cyrus Mistry of the $97 billion Tata Group is one of those who has met the Prime Minister, proof of a relationship that goes back to the days Mistry was head of the Shapoorji Pallonji construction group which had bagged several projects in Gujarat. Then there is Tulsi Tanti, a diehard campaigner for green energy and chairman of the embattled wind energy firm Suzlon (which has accumulated a debt of Rs.12,700 crore), who was called by Modi to accompany him to the BRICS summit and even speak at the BRICS Business Forum.

In the waiting room

Then there are those waiting for the Prime Minister's phone call, to be given the odd Rajya Sabha seat (evidently they will be available only a year and a half from now) or the chairmanship of a cultural institution or perhaps even the vice-chancellorship of a university. People like Arvind Panagariya, professor of economics at Columbia University in New York, who pushed "Brand Modi" in the run-up to the polls, former Union minister Arun Shourie, a reformer in the Modi mould, Swapan Dasgupta as well as N.K. Singh. Former home secretary R.K. Singh, who contested the polls from Arrah in Bihar, is eyeing the vicechairmanship of the National Disaster Management Authority, a Cabinet-rank post, but he may have to wait agonisingly long now that the home ministry wants to restructure NDMA as recommended earlier by a committee headed by P.K. Mishra, who is now in the PMO.

Among the MPs, Rajiv Pratap Rudy, who toppled Lalu Prasad's wife Rabri from Saran in Bihar, is leading the charge. Whether it was to get himself to open the Lok Sabha discussion on the President's Speech or being the first BJP speaker to defend the TRAI amendment regularising the appointment of Modi's principal secretary, he is trying every trick in the book to claw his way into the durbar. Modi's durbar.

Thursday 24 July 2014

In #Russia, #Crime #Without #Punishment


Vladimir Putin backs the rebels suspected of shooting down Malaysia Airlines Flight 17. Why each new crisis makes him stronger

The scene was almost too horrible to take in, and yet in a world of bristling threats no scene has been more revealing: under the baking July sun of eastern Ukraine, hundreds of bodies lay rotting as pro-Russian militiamen, some of them apparently drunk, brandished their weapons to keep European observers away. A Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 bearing 298 souls–AIDS researchers, young lovers, eager children–had been blown out of the sky, apparently by a Russian-made missile, and the dead fell in a gruesome storm. One voice, and one voice only, could put an end to this indecent standoff over the innocent victims. But Vladimir Putin merely shrugged and pointed a finger at the Ukrainian government and, by extension, its Western allies. “Without a doubt,” Putin told a meeting of his economic aides on the night of the disaster, “the state over whose territory this happened bears the responsibility for this frightful tragedy.”


Had Putin finally gone too far? As the days passed and the stench rose, the coldly calculating Russian President got his answer: apparently not. While state-controlled media at home buried Russia’s role in the disaster under an avalanche of anti-Western propaganda, leaders in Europe and the U.S. found themselves stymied once again by Putin’s brazenness. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte, whose nation lost 193 citizens in the attack (one of them a U.S.-passport holder) called pitifully on Putin to do “what is expected of him” in helping recover the bodies. U.S. President Barack Obama struck a similar tone on July 21 after the victims’ remains had been packed into refrigerated train cars out of reach of foreign investigators: “Given its direct influence over the separatists, Russia and President Putin in particular has direct responsibility to compel them to cooperate with the investigation. That is the least that they can do.”

The End of Iraq
How Many People Watched Orange Is the New Black? No One Knows
That was the crisis in a nutshell: the least Putin could do was the most Obama could ask for. The American President announced no deadlines, drew no red lines and made no threats. Even as U.S. intelligence sources asserted with growing confidence that Russian weapons and Russian allies were behind the missile attack, U.S. diplomats were met with roadblocks as they tried to rally Europe to stiffen sanctions against Putin. Obama and Rutte spoke as leaders without leverage, for their voters aren’t interested in military conflict with Russia or its puppets. A generation of Westerners has grown up in the happy belief that the Cold War ended long ago and peace is Europe’s fated future. They are slow to rally to the chore of once again containing Russia’s ambitions.

So Putin presses ahead. His increasingly overt goal is to splinter Europe, rip up the NATO umbrella and restore Russian influence around the world. As if to put an exclamation point on that manifesto, the pro-Russian rebels in Ukraine apparently resumed their antiaircraft attacks less than a week after the destruction of Flight 17. On July 23, two military aircraft belonging to the pro-Western Ukrainian government were shot down just a few miles away from the airliner’s crash site.

And Putin evidently will keep going as long as each new crisis only makes him stronger. The 21st century czar has mastered the dark art of stirring up problems that only he can solve, so that Western leaders find themselves scolding him one minute while pleading with him the next. The crisis in Syria last year is a perfect example. He supplied weapons and training for the armies of President Bashar Assad, propping up the tyrant while Western statesmen demanded Assad’s ouster. Yet when Assad crossed the “red line” drawn by Obama and used chemical weapons against his own people, Putin stepped in to broker the solution. At the urging of the Russian President, Assad gave up his stockpile of chemical weapons. In turn, the U.S. backed away from air strikes in Syria. And guess who still reigns in Damascus? Putin’s ally Assad.

Other world leaders try to avoid crises; Putin feasts on them. When a pro-Western government came to power in Ukraine, Putin dashed in to annex the region of Crimea–an act that redrew the borders of Europe and snatched away Ukraine’s territorial jewel. Within a month, Western diplomats began stuffing the issue into the past. Why? Because by then, Russia had stolen a march on eastern Ukraine, giving the West another crisis to deal with–and another problem that only Putin could reconcile. He made a show of pulling Russian troops back a short distance from the border with Ukraine, but Russian arms and trainers kept the separatists supplied for the fight. And when the fighting produced the macabre spectacle of the rotting corpses, once again the instigator was in the driver’s seat.

“Mr. Putin, send my children home,” pleaded a heartbroken Dutch mother named Silene Fredriksz-Hogzand, whose son Bryce, along with his girlfriend Daisy Oehlers, were among the victims of Flight 17. And he did send them home–but only after the crash site had been so thoroughly looted and trampled that investigators may never be able to prove exactly what happened.

Divided We Stand

Can the West stop a figure who is determined to uphold the dreary habits of czars and Soviet leaders while projecting Russian exceptionalism and power? Putin doesn’t have a lot to worry about when he looks at the forces aligned against him. Obama, as the leader of a war-weary nation, has ruled out all military options, including the provision of weapons to Ukraine. Europe is both too divided and too dependent on Russian energy supplies to provoke any lasting rupture in relations. The only option would seem to be the steady ratcheting up of sanctions.

That’s harder than it sounds. Putin has allies in the heart of Europe–notably Italy, which now holds the rotating presidency of the E.U.–and it has lobbied against the sort of sanctions that could do serious damage to Russia’s economy. Cutting off trade, the Italians say (and they speak for others), would only reverse the current, inflicting substantial pain on European corporations that benefit from it. “The Europeans are in a panic over the U.S. line on sanctions,” says Sergei Markov, a Kremlin-connected political consultant who traveled to Europe in mid-July to rally support among pundits and politicians there. “As soon as the E.U. gets the slightest chance to turn away from Washington on the issue of Ukraine, they will take it.”

Even if Europe does begin to match Washington’s tough stance on sanctions, there is scant evidence to suggest that they will work. They did not, for example, dissuade Russia from allegedly giving the separatists sophisticated SA-11 missiles, one of which U.S. intelligence officials say was probably used to shoot down MH 17. Imposing sanctions may simply make Putin lash out more. “It’s like poking a bear in the paw with a needle,” says Andrei Illarionov, who served as Putin’s top economic adviser in the early 2000s. “Will it prevent him from ransacking your cooler? Probably not.”

In fact, the first three rounds of U.S. sanctions–targeting Russian officials, oligarchs and state-run companies–have done little to stop the bleeding of Ukraine. If anything, as the world turned its attention away from the conflict in the former Soviet republic in the past several weeks, the fighting there has worsened. The top NATO commander in Europe, U.S. Air Force General Philip Breedlove, says Russian weapons and paramilitary fighters have continued flowing through the holes at the border. Russian troops massed in western Russia have kept up the threat of a full-scale invasion. “Everything that Putin has done has shown that he is absolutely all in on this issue,” says Ian Bremmer, head of the New York City–based Eurasia Group consultancy. “The Russians do not back down.”

Crackdowns and Conspiracy Theories

Instead of chastening the Russian President, the prospect of isolation has only seemed to harden his resolve. Nor is there any sign that Moscow’s ruling class–a section of Russian society that constitutes a key pillar of support for the President–has flinched in the face of Western threats and sanctions. Putin’s public-approval rating is the envy of every Western leader, standing at 86% as of late June, 20 points higher than when the Ukraine crisis began last winter, according to the independent Levada-Center polling agency.

But even if more-meaningful sanctions were somehow enacted, there is no guarantee they would help shove Putin off his pedestal. The Russian President thrives in crisis because he so effectively controls the narrative in the motherland. Russia’s pro-Kremlin TV networks–both state-controlled and private–are the main source of information for 90% of Russians. This TV propaganda machine helps keep Putin secure in an era when other strongmen have been toppled in revolutions driven in part by social media. Apart from a state-backed crackdown this year on independent news websites, the Kremlin’s supporters have proved adept at drowning out online dissent and flooding the Russian-language web with Putinthink.

His media networks have cast the conflict in eastern Ukraine as a righteous struggle, pitting a resurgent Russia against the conniving West. The pro-Putin talking heads on these channels hit reliably similar themes, championing Russian dignity, Orthodox Christian values, the survival of the Russian-speaking world and the fall of the American menace. Now MH 17 is being crammed into this narrative. After a brief wait for Putin to set the tone, a tide of conspiracy theories flooded the Russian media, all of them blaming Ukraine or its ally, the U.S., for shooting down the plane. With feelings toward the U.S. at an all-time low in Levada’s surveys, this wasn’t a difficult sell for a populace weaned on the dogmas of the Cold War. “It goes without saying that everything bad that happens to us is initiated by the United States,” says Mikhail Zygar, editor in chief of Russia’s only independent news channel. “That’s something many Russian politicians or just ordinary Russians get with their mother’s milk.”

Putin’s designs, meanwhile, are far grander than Ukraine. He hopes the conflict on Russia’s western flank will create divisions within Europe that shrink American influence. His vision–which he referred to on April 17, at the peak of Russia’s euphoria over the conquest of Crimea–is the creation of a “greater Europe” that would stretch from Portugal to Russia’s Pacific Coast, with Moscow as one of its centers of influence. By creating problems like Ukraine that only he can solve, he puts himself in the center of European politics. Russia’s vast oil and gas resources–on which Europe relies–only add to his influence.

The U.S., in this scenario, becomes a rival rather than an ally of Europe. “The United States is a major global player, and at a certain point it seemed to think that it was the only leader and a unipolar system was established. Now we can see that is not the case,” Putin said at the end of his appearance on a call-in show that day in April. “If they try to punish someone like misbehaving children or to stand them in the corner on a sack of peas or do something to hurt them, eventually they will bite the hand that feeds them. Sooner or later, they will realize this.”

A Case of Russian Pride

What happens in the aftermath of the MH 17 disaster will test Putin’s assessment of declining American power. The coming days will determine whether the U.S. and Europe can form a united front against a country that virtually the entire world believes handed a loaded weapon to an unregulated militia. “We can’t do this unilaterally,” says a senior official in the Obama Administration. “We’ve got to work with the Europeans on a strategy to help contain Russia.”

So far there’s not much unity on show. Four days after the downing of the airliner, when the bodies of the victims were still stuck in rebel territory, French President François Hollande said France would go ahead with the sale of at least one warship to Russia, the helicopter carrier Mistral, against the direct objections of the U.S. and U.K. “The symbolism is terrible,” the Administration official tells Time on condition of anonymity.

The symbolism was not much better when E.U. Foreign Ministers met on July 22 to discuss ways to isolate Russia further. Even with emotions still raw over the downing of MH 17, the ministers did not bring European sanctions into line with those of the U.S., choosing instead to add a few names to their blacklist of rebel leaders and Russian technocrats. They pledged to draft a list of harsher punishments later in the week, possibly including an arms embargo. Even the Dutch, who lost so many, do not yet seem keen to take the lead. “In the near term, much will depend on the Dutch and where European opinion settles,” says the Administration official. “The Europeans had already been moving forward–slowly, but forward.”

Certainly, the Dutch-led investigation into the shoot-down isn’t likely to trouble Putin soon. British experts are analyzing the plane’s flight recorders. Forensic experts are examining the wreckage that was scattered across an area of several square miles. The investigation could take years, and it will be complicated by the fact that the people likely responsible for the disaster–the rebel fighters–had several days to remove evidence of their culpability.

There is always the chance of a quick and unexpected breakthrough–a missile fragment with a chemical signature or a serial number identifying its source. One of the trigger pullers could break his silence and confess to the crime. That could lead to an arrest, extradition, a trial and conviction years down the road. But these are chances Putin seems willing to take. “Maybe he can still apologize,” says Zbigniew Brzezinski, who served as National Security Adviser under President Jimmy Carter. “But he would have to swallow a lot of mendacity.”

Besides, for now, Vladimir Putin answers to virtually no one. His command of the Russian airwaves will help him manage any blowback at home, spinning even the most damning evidence as part of an ancient American conspiracy. The more the world picks on him and Russia, the more it feeds a Russian will to push back, out of a sense of pride and victimhood. Isolation will still be the West’s only means of attack, and if Europe has lacked the will to impose it after Syria, after Crimea and even amid the global outrage over MH 17, it is unlikely to take action once the shock of the crash subsides. Putin has played this game before. He need only bide his time for the West’s own inaction to clear him.

2014 Commonwealth Games (@thecgf)


The Indian contingent headed by flag-bearer and Olympic silver medallist shooter Vijay Kumar led the Parade of Nations, by virtue of being hosts in 2010 Delhi edition. 

Ace shooter Vijay Kumar holds the Tricolour as he leads the Indian contingent at Celtic Park during the opening ceremony of Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, स्कॉटलंद

India's contingent marching past at Celtic Park during the opening ceremony of Commonwealth Games in Glasgow, स्कॉटलैंड

The the men looked dapper in black blazers and Gray trousers along with headgear while the women athletes were dressed in सरिस.


The 35,000 capacity Celtic stadium cheered as the Indians entered to the tune of popular Bollywood numbers. 

As per convention, the head of Commonwealth countries Queen Elizabeth II declared the Games Open. "It is my greatest pleasure to declare the 20th Commonwealth Games open" Her Majesty said under a blue Glasgow sky to signal Scotland's third CWG and first after 1986 when Duke of Edinburgh played होस्ट.
A girl poses with a placard saying 'Proud To Be An Indian' and with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's picture at the opening ceremony of Commonwealth गमेस.
Indians with the Tricolor cheer for their country ahead of the opening ceremony of Commonwealth Games. 
Indians holding the Tricolor, express their excitement for the games at the venue ahead of the opening ceremony of Commonwealth Games.









India: School bus and train crash kills 13 children



At least 13 children were killed along with their driver when a school bus was hit by a train in the Indian state of Telangana, police said.

The passenger train rammed into the school bus, dragging it several hundred metres down the track, reports said.

Nineteen other students who were travelling on the bus were injured. No one on the train was hurt.

The accident happened at an unmanned level crossing near Masaipet village in Medak district.

There are nearly 15,000 unmanned crossings on Indian railways and correspondents say hundreds of people are killed on these crossings every year.

After Thursday's crash, local villagers rushed to help rescue some of the children who were trapped in the vehicle before the emergency services reached the scene.

An investigation has been ordered into the accident.

Safety standards on India's massive state-run railway network, which operates 9,000 passenger trains and carries some 23 million passengers every day, has been an ongoing concern especially after a spate of recent accidents.

Last month, several coaches of a passenger train derailed in Bihar state, killing at least four people and injuring 10 others.

And in May at least 20 people were killed when a passenger train derailed and hit a stationary goods train in Uttar Pradesh state.

Wednesday 23 July 2014

Megyn Kelly (@megynkelly)


An authoritative force in cable news

Ten years ago, my wife Kim, then Fox News’ Washington bureau chief, walked into my office carrying a videocassette. “You have got to see this,” Kim said. It was the audition tape of a local TV reporter then named Megyn Kendall. She was a lawyer and new to the business, but her tape displayed as full a set of the qualities of a network correspondent as I had ever seen: great looks, strong voice, authoritative yet cheerful presence and obvious intelligence. In other words, limitless potential. But there was a problem: we had no openings, which was quickly pointed out to me when I enthused about her during a phone call with Fox News chair Roger Ailes and other executives. “Please,” I asked Roger, “just look at the tape.” I suspected he would see what I had seen. He did, and an opening was created. From the start, Megyn gave us insightful Supreme Court coverage, and she was among the first to spot flaws in the false rape charges against the Duke lacrosse players. She was too good to last as a mere correspondent, and she didn’t. The rest, as they say, is history
.

Robert Lanza (@robertlanza )


A researcher in the vanguard of stem-cell science

It’s been done with sheep, frogs, mice and even infant human cells, but no one had had success in cloning cells from adults, a much more challenging feat since decades of development have to be erased and reprogrammed. Dr. Robert Lanza, chief scientific officer at biotech firm Advanced Cell Technology, working with a group of researchers at CHA University in South Korea, changed all that.
His team inserted DNA from a donor cell into an egg stripped of its own genetic code, but the goal isn’t to create mini-mes. Instead, the method could mean a new way to make stem cells, which could then be turned into new nerve, muscle or insulin-producing cells to treat or even cure diseases like Alzheimer’s and diabetes.
The breakthrough is sweet for Lanza, who spent years defending work on stem cells extracted from excess IVF embryos at a time when lawmakers and the White House banned federal funding for some studies. The controversies may continue, but thanks to Lanza the science will too.

Megan Ellison (@meganeellison )


Hollywood's powerful wunderkind

The Italian Renaissance flourished because patrons like the Medici family sponsored artists and valued their craft. Today the film industry has been blessed with a modern version of the Medicis — a single benefactor who has the utmost respect for cinema: Megan Ellison.
I first met Megan on the set of Lawless in 2011 and quickly discovered her love of cinema. Her Annapurna Pictures produces daringly original films driven by visionaries, including Zero Dark ThirtyTrue GritThe MasterAmerican Hustle and Her. They have earned a total of 35 Academy Award nominations, and she is the first female producer to earn two Best Picture nominations in the same year. Oh, and she’s only 28.
Megan is not only changing the direction our industry is going in, she’s also enriching our culture. Where would we be without Lorenzo the Magnificent supporting Leonardo da Vinci and Michelangelo? I’m glad that we’ll never have to know.